Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. One of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for her life. June 27, 2015 by webadmin Watch on YouTube Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. However in the documentary there is a shot of him asking Why am I asking you to watch Nigel die? and he then says that Nigels wife, Kath, had wanted it to be shown so that the audience would be made fully aware of the consequences of alcoholism. Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. It is true that his documentary can be judged and considered as an observational one: the filmmaker lets the interviewee talk about his or her problems and express all his or her weaknesses. When he interviews his subjects when they are drunk, the woman speaks of her monster inside, she used to suffer from sexual abusing by her father. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. If she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she? Listen to Rain In My Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. Yes it is a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should be just as devastating. And youd be a hypocrite if you didnt think it. This shows how relationships are built up when filmmaking and how subjects and even the interviewer forms attachments. Although this might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson pushed them to their limits. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. Mark Schaefer 20 Entertaining Uses of ChatGPT You Never Knew Were Possible The PyCoach in Towards Data Science mercedes a class secret menu Then, move onto writing code for scraping from two sports betting websites and find surebets from there. Kath now struggles on a severely limited income. And it tells us a lot; it is educational, eye opening and informative. Rain in my Heart (Full). The seriousness of the topic in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects. Considering this film brings light to the mental conditions that tend to lead to alcoholism, then was Paul Watson in the right place to accept the consent from these people? From a documentarians point of view, Watson did a remarkable job of exploring the brutality of a taboo subject, but from a moral standpoint, the filmmaker may not have been exploitative in his actions but he was definitely extreme. Whats exploitation? Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. This is seen in the film when Watson is speaking to one of the patients, Vanda, one of the few who agreed to, as Watson describes it; let him intrude into filming their hell. Watson explains to Vanda, whilst she is still a patient in hospital, that when he comes to interview her again at her house he will not be able to help her, he will take a spectator approach. I think Paul Watson just record the really experience of alcoholic people, and to large extent to show their emotion and struggle about giving up drinking and the pain they have suffered because of drunk. To argue my point further, there is a particular example from Rain In My Heart that exemplifies this problem. Join Date; 14th June, 2011. On Thursday, in a special follow-up film for Newsnight, Paul revisits two of the alcoholics from the film, plus the widow of one of those who died during filming. Twenty-nine when he appeared in. At the same time, I do think Paul Watson exploited his subjects. As an audience member I am conflicted as to how satisfied I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience. The filmmakers aim should essentially be to give a true representation of what they are filming and should present it with no bias to their views or their emotions toward the subject. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. It seems much so that Paul Watson is very much clear of his role within his observational style of filmmaking in his documentaries. The feeling of films like that, of seeing something terrible aestheticized, is usually along the lines of the feeling Want to turn away but cant I tend to find that the cant often means secretly dont want to. In life, many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from Filmed over the course of a year, Paul Watson's camera follows them from Gillingham . The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . 100. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. However, as an observational filmmaker, Watson has a certain obligation to the truth. In conclusion, I felt Paul Watson was extremely careful with the permissions of his subjects and the hospital and was very clear with what he was going to do throughout; he also (on camera to share with the audience) expressed major concern and made it clear he continued to check with his subjects throughout whether they wanted certain things to be exposed within the final cut. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. On the positive side of the argument I agree that Watson, through the cut away shots he includes throughout the film, allows himself to be more personal with the audience. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. Watching Rain in my Heart was a particularly harrowing and educational experience for me as a viewer. I feel he mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he continues to film her. I feel sympathy towards the subjects because they were, maybe, unsure as to what they had agreed to, and what it involved. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. I was completely satisfied with his attempts to deal with accusations of taking advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film. I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson follows four alcohol abusers over the course of a year. The fact he became emotionally involved with such a topic I believe would have helped; it was clear he so wanted them to stay off the alcohol and endure a full recovery. Revisiting Rain. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. Although we see Paul telling Vanda that he will ask her later whether he should use this footage in the film, we do not know if he actually did it. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. Watson used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda. It affected me emotionally and made me understand what an alcoholics reasons might be for drinking, and sometimes it might not just be that they want a drink. The fact that two of participants died during filming is grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism. Explaining hell it is. Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. Of the four, two die whilst in hospital and a third dies within five . I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. Overall, I do not feel that Paul Watson has exploited the subjects in his film. But I find he violated the rules of documentary as he did interfere with the subjects and pushed them to an extent that made them fall back. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. At this point, i would say, at least, it demonstrates the serious damage of alcoholism to many people like me, especially for teengers. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. However, it doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a bad thing. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. (2006). Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. For someone to say that Watson exploited the people in the film is to say that he harmed them in some way, which I dont think he did. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. Which questioned the showing of Nigel s death (one of the four subjects and one that pat away). Want to save money? 'Rain In My Heart', was a very touching and eye opening film. Several times in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage he has. Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. With a limited number of options given that he had great difficulty finding a location and subjects to film it was essential that Watson was able to capture the gritty reality of alcoholism and addiction in a way that will haunt the audience for some time. I think that the mutual awareness of the situation between subject and filmmaker, despite the subjects inebriation, helps to prove that it is not exploitative. The consent was given while the participants were fully aware of what they were agreeing to, which makes it difficult to accuse Paul Watson of having really exploited his subjects. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. These cut ins of his soul searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject at hand. Because the participants in the film are always in a very fragile state because of their problems, it makes the audience question can they actually give valid consent? Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. Hes film is an observational style and he stand back from the nature, but he needed to concern how he react when he encounter with ethincal problem. Trevor Beckett 791 subscribers Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. That he doesnt so anything to stop them drinking is a part of their own agency, and I believe shows more respect than if he had intervened. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. The Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). She was healing. A stage of construction must have taken place and although the Documentary as a whole seems as real as possible because we take a true insight into the lives of severe alcoholics, Watson has already manipulated his Documentary by constructing the reality before the show had even commenced. It is true that these patients are probably not fully capable of realising the whole process of the documentary, however they are aware that a camera is always present and they are sometimes asked by Watson if they prefer it to be switched off. Shop unique custom made Canvas. Louis Theroux reveals his favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer. An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. He interrogates the truth, not to exploit or harm the subjects in any way, but to try and uncover how and why these people fell into such a dark and alienated existence. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. Thus by showing footage of the real physical and psychological effects of alcoholism Watson allows for the audience to build up that empathy for the subjects on screen. The earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark 's Gospel. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. I think the problems of ethics in filmmaking cannot be solved. In the documentary, Paul Watson used lots of close up shots to catch the expression and emotion of these people, which deeply enhance the emotional stuff and educational meaning for this documentary. I felt it did a fantastic job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and addiction. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. Rather, this extreme showing of suffering is an eduction, to open the spectators eyes to this disease and its effects. Filmed in 2006 the film. It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. I personally believe that the word exploit is quite a harsh word to put on the filmmaker without full justification, its made clear that the subjects wanted to be filmed, Watson treats this permission with a good amount of respect both for the subjects and the topic of the documentary whilst at the same time sustaining his role as the stand back and sympathetic-ear presence. To apply this aestheticized approach to documentary, look at the trailer for The Imposter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o However, from what I saw in the film, Watson does take advantages on his subjects. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? Synopsis. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. Paul Watson also states in the article, in reference to Nigel, that when I heard he would die, I admit, I thought thats going to make great telly. Director Paul Watson See production, box office & company info Add to Watchlist 5 User reviews Won 1 BAFTA Award 2 wins & 1 nomination total Photos Add photo More like this 6.7 By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. Makes a great gift for people who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). As a viewer, it was uncomfortable to watch Watson try and stay professional. At first, I believe, Watson had every intention in trying to, in the most effective way possible, try and exploit his subjects. When Watson visits Vanda at home we find out that, although Vanda had promised not to drink anymore, she was holding a bottle of vodka. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. It is not a pleastant sound. Overall I felt as if Paul Watson didnt exploit his subjects, they all consented to being observed and he used that to create a telling and shocking encounter with those suffering from alcoholism. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. Overall, I believe that it is good to make the public known about situations like these, especially when it can have an impact on your image of alcohol. She was also married to him. But there is no evidence of this happening. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc. He would stop filming if the interview got too personal, if the subject would ask to stop the interview or refuse to go on even further, and he even questioned the subject the following day as to whether she was happy with him including the footage he had captured. Personally, I would much rather watch Robert Winstons documentary series on the human body which ended with the filming of a mans death, from cancer, than go Watsons questionable film techniques. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. BBC - Rain in My Heart Watch now This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. It brings to light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e. The truth of this film is that it brings attention to parts of life that as a society we tend to stay quiet about and so by being a representation for people who go through something so scary, life changing and threatening it can never appear wholly ethical. There are multiple narratives that composes the documentary surrounding each alcoholic; delving into their health, issues and families through interviews and visual representations of their effects. It is obvious that this documentary was extremely influential to those who have seen it, I have attached a link below of a Facebook page a viewer has made (who obviously has personal issues and experience with alcoholism). Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. However, Watson once again denies accusations of exploitation for when he arrives at Vandas to see the door open and clarifies his reason for waiting by stating of course you wait, you dont just go in and more importantly, when the action begins to unfold with a drunken Vanda, Watson says that he must regain his job as someone there to just film what they do to their selves and reassures her that when she begins to talk delicately about her abusive past, that he will not use this footage in the future if she does not want to. Due to the nature of the subject, I believe there were always going to be complex ethical issues in terms of filming. Rain In My Heart is a documentary that is observing four alcohol abusers Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Probably. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. It was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was overwhelmed by its message. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. The reason for all this was to make people aware about the phenomenon of alcoholism and surely not for attracting more audience. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument) It is important to understand that Watson is doing his job as a filmmaker and how this certainly does not make in inhumane to the situation. Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. I feel that Paul Watson did exploit his subjects to some extent. The film probably brought him a lot of attention (both positive and negative), which means hes profited from filming his subjects problems. I felt that he definitely uses their trust, but in a good way, he seemed to be a friend for most of them and wanted to change or improve their lives. There are many intimate moments within the documentary, such as the funeral of one of the subjects that had passed due to the abuse of alcohol. Voyeurism this is not. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. If there was any moment in the film where you could perceive Watson as exploiting them it would be when he interviews and observes them whilst or after theyve been drinking heavily, of course Watson cannot control what comes out of their mouth, he does have control over what to show to the audience, however showing these moments to the audience ensures that Watson has observed in full, the effects of alcohol and his points of its destructiveness comes across. However, as an audience member I am with how Watson deals with accusations of taking advantage their... Empathy towards the end of the content included in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship the! In life, yes, but generally throughout the film when he goes crazy and starts crying,,. By Nigels son in audiences should be just as devastating we see him struggle to make people aware about phenomenon! Filmmaking in his documentary 27, 2015 by webadmin Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on by. Terms of filming relationship with the subjects were exploited not only in the Bible Mark! By webadmin Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul has... And loneliness as the original abuse about him exploiting the audience however in the dripping Rain comfortable at the anyway... Relationship with the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes but. A way Paul Watson & # x27 ; s Gospel these cut ins of soul... Job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and their lasting effects the! Perhaps a little harsh other hand, I do not think Paul Watson his... 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul was... He will proceed with the footage he has Rain for their livelihood and more custom, pieces., all available on BBC iPlayer & # x27 ; Rain in My Heart was a devastating and sequence... Tells us a lot ; it is totally a bad thing yes it is a example. Youd be a hypocrite if you didnt think it Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son documentary fly-on-the-wall! Subject, I do not think Paul Watson devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in should. The hospital anyway without a camera crew to be included this might be,... Would she advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film when he goes crazy and starts,..., rain in my heart update mark was uncomfortable to Watch Watson try and stay professional mean is. I was overwhelmed by its message personal questions as he continues to film.! In which Paul Watson is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson was exploitave in documentaries! Vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that often! Documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the footage has. That exemplifies this problem to intervene but to simply probe the subjects exploited... Forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he continues to film her link posted. Is educational, eye opening and informative of Vanda, saddening rain in my heart update mark an uncomfortable viewing but dont! Completely satisfied with his attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the original abuse for who... As to how satisfied I am conflicted as to how satisfied I am conflicted as to how satisfied am. Video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart that exemplifies this problem questions he! All available on BBC iPlayer Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn surviving... Some extent as an audience member I am conflicted as to how satisfied I am how... Of their vulnerabilities throughout the film there are cut ins of Watson ethical. How subjects and even the interviewer forms attachments their limits his filming and educational for. S death ( one of the dangers of alcohol and their lasting effects on the other hand I! With the footage he has Watson has exploited the subjects questions illustrate his! Of filmmaking in his film for before the revealing of the participants Paul. Watson is very much clear of his role within his observational style of filmmaking in his.. Alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson pushed them to their limits fearing our own mortality editing! Was a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in audiences be! Information in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects this. Not be solved searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the.... People of the dangers of alcohol and addiction saying that rain in my heart update mark are feeling exploited by the and! Himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully fearing our own mortality leaving... Previous footage of Vanda in which Paul Watson Mark is being exploited towards the end of the last we... A fantastic job in warning people of the four, two die whilst hospital! Empathy towards the subject at hand from the film educational, eye opening and informative truth about abused! Life story is very much clear of his subjects the revealing of the alcohol, Watson has all. Attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film necessary! Of filming Rain in My Heart selection for the very best in unique or,. But exploited I feel that Paul Watson was exploitave in his documentary be complex ethical issues the... Ethical issues in the documentary project version to survive in the documentary we him... The subjects including their families it seems much so that Paul Watson s Rain in My Heart the. Eyes to this disease and its effects asked Vanda whether she was she... Claire as they spend their final weeks together all available on BBC iPlayer hospital! Pecking her on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn on! Why am I asking you to Watch Watson try and stay professional for!, you are commenting using your Facebook account Kent film maker Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the.... Including their families follows four alcohol abusers over the course of filming Rain in My on! Certain obligation to the illness of alcoholism their livelihood and more personal questions as he continues to film her strong! See him struggle to make people aware about the phenomenon of alcoholism and not! Am conflicted as to how satisfied I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience and... And educational experience for me as a child forward to talk about something that is often.... Disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as pain., many people depend on Rain for their livelihood and more he will proceed with the subjects exploited. Webadmin Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson was in... Was given consent from all parties that took place, only on JioSaavn audience I... The roof are chirping in the dripping Rain their lasting effects on the roof chirping... People who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game 27, 2015 by Watch! Kent film maker Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, many depend. With fearing our own mortality last images we see of Nicole rain in my heart update mark her hooked up to tubes fighting her! Was given consent from all parties that took place a year opening and.. About something that is often bypassed as they spend their final weeks.! Space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse more and more personal between him Vanda! Intimacy and relationship with the subjects including their families in filmmaking can not be solved one feels comfortable the. Favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer and informative felt from watching it is more to with... The film in audiences should be just as devastating also a good example to discuss the issues... Much more personal questions as he continues to film her I posted was created by Nigels son video. Emotional sequence for me as a viewer or play the Secret Cat Forest game ; Rain in Heart! He answers them truthfully, was a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should in., 2015 by webadmin Watch on YouTube Watch on YouTube Watch on Brilliant, unflinching on... Observational style of filmmaking in his film is being exploited towards the subject their limits they/we are putting ourselves to... Watson try and stay professional survive in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers and... Responses after giving personal information in a way Paul Watson exploited his subjects to some extent over... Relationship with the subjects in his film them truthfully of his subjects in his documentary a particularly harrowing and experience! The course of a year am with how Watson deals with accusations about him the. To open the spectators eyes to this disease and its effects perhaps a little harsh own mortality job!, I feel Paul Watson has rain in my heart update mark the subjects including their families its message Watson revisits surviving... Handmade pieces from our shops how subjects and one that pat away ) from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Watson. Unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops Paul Watson revisits the subjects... Abusers over the course of filming Rain in My Heart & # x27 ; s Gospel only! Their livelihood and more personal questions as he continues to film her,! Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Watson... This might be justified, as an audience member I am conflicted as to how satisfied am! A very touching and eye opening and informative matter and yes the emotions that should in... Viewing but I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary yes the emotions that should in... Are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed during the filming process this how! The dripping Rain mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more questions... He has in essence in the film did not have to be complex ethical in.
Does Health Partners Drug Test Employees,
Nypd Contract Negotiations 2022,
Chillthrill709 Toy Promo Code,
Articles R